Board and Functional Committees Performance Evaluation
| type | evaluation periods | evaluation cycles | evaluation scope | method of evaluation | evaluation content |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| External | 2022.01.01 - 2022.12.31 | every three years | Board of Directors | An independent professional external team, taking into account each company’s stage of development, conducts a desk review of the Board of Directors’ operations and engages in on-site interviews and interactions with board members. The team assists the company in periodically examining the effectiveness of the Board’s functions and jointly identifying opportunities for enhancement that best reflect the company’s culture and distinctive characteristics while aligning with the company’s phased development objectives. |
|
Internal | 2025.01.01 - 2025.12.31 | Once a year | Board of Directors | Board of Directors |
|
| 2025.01.01 - 2025.12.31 | Once a year | Individual Board members | Mutual Evaluation by Directors |
| |
| 2025.01.01 - 2025.12.31 | Once a year | Audit Committee | Self-evaluation by independent directors |
| |
| 2025.01.01 - 2025.12.31 | Once a year | Remuneration Committee | Self-evaluation by members |
| |
| 2025.01.01 - 2025.12.31 | Once a year | Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee | Self-evaluation by members |
| |
| 2025.01.01 - 2025.12.31 | Once a year | Sustainability & ERM Committee | Self-evaluation by members |
|
Results of the Performance Evaluation of the Board of Directors and Functional Committees
Self-evaluation
5
Board Performance Self-Evaluation (Maximum Score: 5)
4.98
Individual Director Performance Self-Evaluation (Maximum Score: 5)
100%
Committee Members’ Satisfaction by Evaluation Item
The Company has completed the Board performance self-evaluation for 2025. The assessment results are scheduled to be reported to the Board in March 2026 and will serve as the basis for review and improvement.
The overall average score of the Board’s self-evaluation was 5.00 out of 5, and the overall average score of the individual directors’ self-evaluations was 4.98 out of 5, indicating sound Board operations. The self-evaluation results of the Audit Committee, Remuneration Committee, Corporate Sustainability and Risk Management Committee, and Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee showed 100% satisfaction across all measurement items among all committee members.
External evaluation
The Rules for Performance Evaluation of the Board of Directors and Functional Committees were approved and adopted by the Board on August 12, 2021. In 2022, the Company engaged an independent external professional organization, the Taiwan Investor Relations Association (TIRA), to conduct the external performance evaluation of the first-term Board of Directors. In 2025, the Company will engage an independent external professional organization, the Taiwan Corporate Governance Association (TCGA), to conduct the external performance evaluation of the second-term Board of Directors.
evaluation periods | 2024.07.01 - 2025.06.30( Second term of the Board) |
| On-site Evaluation Date | 2025.08.07 |
| Name of the external professional institution conducting the evaluation | Taiwan Corporate Governance Association |
| Reasons for the independence of the external institution | The Taiwan Corporate Governance Association is not a related party of the Company, nor does it have a commercial relationship that affects independence. None of the participants and their relatives within the second degree of kinship has a direct or indirect financial interest relationship with or accepts gifts from the Company. |
| Evaluation methods (such as questionnaires or onsite visits) | An independent professional external team, taking into account each company’s stage of development, conducts a desk review of the Board of Directors’ operations and engages in on-site interviews and interactions with board members. The team assists the company in periodically examining the effectiveness of the Board’s functions and jointly identifying opportunities for enhancement that best reflect the company’s culture and distinctive characteristics while aligning with the company’s phased development objectives. |
| Criteria (content and items) |
|
| Estimated Date to Report Evaluation Results to the Board | 2026.03.06 |
evaluation periods | 2022.01.01 - 2022.12.31( First term of the Board) |
| On-site Evaluation Date | 2023.01.11- 2023.01.17 |
| Name of the external professional institution conducting the evaluation | Taiwan Investor Relations Association (TIRA) |
| Reasons for the independence of the external institution | The Taiwan Investor Relations Association is not a related party of the Company and has no business relationship that would impair independence. The participating personnel and their relatives within the second degree of kinship do not hold positions with significant influence at the Company. They also have no direct or indirect financial interests with the Company and have not accepted gifts. |
| Evaluation methods (such as questionnaires or onsite visits) | The evaluation was conducted using three methods: (1) review of Company-provided documents and public disclosures; (2) a self-evaluation questionnaire designed by the Association in accordance with applicable regulations and incorporating the guidance under the Corporate Governance 3.0 — Sustainable Development Roadmap; and (3) on-site interviews. |
| Criteria (content and items) |
|
| Reporting Date for the Evaluation Results to the Board | 2023.02.23 |
Recommendations and improvement plans are as below (Second term of the Board):
![]() Recommendation | ![]() Improvement plan |
| Recommend establishing a channel for independent directors (or the Audit Committee) to concurrently receive material whistleblowing reports, to further strengthen the whistleblower mechanism. | Plan for the Chief Audit Executive to report regularly to the independent directors |
| Establish the New Director Orientation and Training Program | Plan to formulate the Guidelines for the New Director Induction Training Program to further enhance the completeness of the Company’s corporate governance framework. |
Recommendations and improvement plans are as below (Frist term of the Board):
![]() Recommendation | ![]() Improvement plan |
| The Board shall include at least one female director or at least one director with legal expertise. | The second-term Board has planned to include female director nominees and nominees with legal expertise, in line with the Board’s diversity objectives. |
| The Committee should comprise a majority of independent directors. | The Company is considering whether to establish a Nomination Committee. |
| Establish a full-time Corporate Governance Officer position | The Company will further evaluate whether to appoint a dedicated Corporate Governance Officer. |
| With reference to Audit Quality Indicators (AQI), the Company assessed the independence and suitability of the signing CPAs and disclosed the results in the annual report. | The original plan has been scheduled for disclosure in the annual report to be presented at the shareholders’ meeting. |
| Invest resources to support domestic cultural development. | The Sustainable Development Best Practice Principles have been amended, and an action plan has been formulated. |

